Posted Apr 19, 2007 at 04:43AM by Rio S. Listed in: Off Topic Tags: Blizzard, Matrix, Drysc
Ó

World of Warcraft's CM Drysc in NPC form - Image 1 We had a feeling of deja vu while surfing the World of Warcraft forums today (and we thought something was getting changed in the Matrix). We found a number of players starting threads with nearly the same opening post (OP).

Actually, they have nearly exact OP save for: one from a player named Draena was griping over the Nether drake mount, the other was from Oddig and was about the Marshfang mount. The discussion was, as these kinds of discussions go, very anti-Blizzard. The players were complaining about the time restricted quests to get the said mounts (how many quests players can do per day and gaining reputation).

The question actually boils down to players thinking that Blizzard is making the World of Warcraft a time sink with every patch - reeling in casual players to play more than they can. They don't want the time restricted quests to control how much they play and when they want to play. Drysc addressed the concern:

The 'one-a-day' quests and turn-ins obviously restrict the amount of times those quests can be completed, and this affords us a few things as far as the rewards we can then provide. These quests are specifically designed for those players that maybe have a few hours a day, or less, to log in and play. With that short amount of time we can guarantee them a solid reward, or solid increment toward a reward, without needing to compensate for the type of player that has a lot of time to devote to simply grinding on them. This is due to limiting the amount of times it can be completed, and thus gearing it towards a more casual playstyle.


So the content is actually geared toward the casual player. The explanation got split reactions from players as some actually preferred to have quests that are time-restricted. Plus the time investment will be both for the hardcore and the casual players. With time restrictions, a player can't just grind all day and get the mount.

So what do you think? Would it be better to have no time restrictions at all? Or will the one-a-day quests take players one step closer to having a sort of equality between the hardcore and casual players?


[Via WoW Forums] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:

3 Comments


Sort by:
   by Connie Ferr (Unregistered) - 2007-04-20
 » Time limited questing rocks!

Frankly, I'm tired of all the hardcore player slanted things in WoW. There needs to be more for the casual player to be able to get in on and take away some advantages from. Those out there who are hardcore players seem to think that the game ought to be geared solely towards them. Fact is... everyone is paying money to play the game and Blizzard needs to reflect that in its game development and design. They could be doing more but I'm glad for what they've done and continue to do.

   by Advertising -
   by Neferon (Unregistered) - 2007-04-27
 » Agreed!

I completely agree with the statement above. It's sad how creative solutions to a problem get rejected by the community that asked for them. One can only hope that Blizzard won't actually start listening to people who complain about this.

   by Cody (Unregistered) - 2007-05-12
 » It sucks!

This completely sucks. It only limits us who play more than 'a few hours a day', it doesn't affect casuals at all, really. They can still get the items for quests in the short time they're online.

In any case, this is just a screen for Blizzard, using the players as an excuse to limit what we can do and pay more for WoW for it, just like the flight paths. You'd think WoW makes enough money, but noooooooooo.



Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!
User Favorites - November
Most Commented
(5)
User Favorites - November
Top Jumps
No available articles using criteria